Measuring naturalistic proximity as a window into caregiver–child interaction patterns

Resumen

The interactions most supportive of positive child development take place in moments of close contact with others. In the earliest years of life, a child’s caregivers are the primary partners in these important interactions. Little is known about the patterns of real-life physical interactions between children and their caregivers, in part due to an inability to measure these interactions as they occur in real time. We have developed a wearable, infrastructure-free device (TotTag) used to dynamically and unobtrusively measure physical proximity between children and caregivers in real-time. We present a case-study illustration of the TotTag with data collected over two (12-hour) days each from two families: a family of four (30-month-old son, 61-month-old daughter, 37-year-old father, 37-year-old mother), and a family of three (12-month-old daughter, 35-year-old-father, 33-year-old mother). We explored patterns of proximity within each parent–child dyad and whether close proximity would indicate periods in which increased opportunity for developmentally critical interactions occur. Each child also wore a widely used wearable audio recording device (LENA) to collect time-synced linguistic input. Descriptive analyses reveal wide variability in caregiver–child proximity both within and across dyads, and that amount of time spent in close proximity with a caregiver is associated with the number of adult words and conversational turns to which a child was exposed. This suggests that variations in proximity are linked to, though, critically, not synonymous with, quantity of a child’s exposure to adult language. Potential implications for deepening understanding of early caregiver–child interactions are discussed.

Áreas y palabras clave

Cómo citar (APA 7)

Salo, V., Pannuto, P., Hedgecock, W., Biri, A., A. Russo, D., Piersiak, H., & Humphreys, K. (2020). Measuring naturalistic proximity as a window into caregiver–child interaction patterns. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h2fy6